LFXP3C-3TN100I Lattice, LFXP3C-3TN100I Datasheet - Page 348

• Manufacturer Part Number: LFXP3C-3TN100I
• Description: FPGA - Field Programmable Gate Array 3.1K LUTs 62 IO 1.8/ 2.5/3.3V -3 Spd I
• Manufacturer: Lattice

Specifications of LFXP3C-3TN100I

• Number Of Programmable I/os: 62
• Data Ram Size: 55296
• Supply Voltage (max): 3.465 V
• Maximum Operating Temperature: + 100 C
• Minimum Operating Temperature: - 40 C
• Mounting Style: SMD/SMT
• Supply Voltage (min): 1.71 V
• Package / Case: TQFP-100
• Package: 100TQFP
• Family Name: LatticeXP
• Device Logic Units: 3000
• Maximum Internal Frequency: 320 MHz
• Typical Operating Supply Voltage: 1.8|2.5|3.3 V
• Maximum Number Of User I/os: 62
• Ram Bits: 55296
• Re-programmability Support: Yes
• Lead Free Status / RoHS Status: Lead free / RoHS Compliant

Lattice Semiconductor
This particular example shows a 99.0% coverage. The way to find unconstrained paths is to run Trace with the
“Check Unconstrained Paths” checkbox selected. This will give a list of all of the signals that are not covered under
timing analysis. In some designs, many of these signals are a common ground net that indeed does not need to be
constrained. Designers should understand this point and use Trace (the ispLEVER static timing analysis tool) to
check unconstrained paths to make sure they are not missing any design paths that are timing critical.
Also, note the timing score shown in Figure 17-1. The timing score shows the total amount of error (in picoseconds)
for all timing preferences constraining the design. PAR attempts to minimize the timing score, PAR does not
attempt to maximize frequency.
The above discussion can be summarized by the following single equality:
Translating Board Requirements into FPGA Preferences
Understanding the system board level timing and design constraints is the primary requirement for producing a
complete preference file. As a result, the major requirements such as clock frequency, I/O timing and loads can be
translated into the appropriate preference statements in a constraint file.
The following exercise will provide an example on how to extract preferences from system conditions.
Figure 17-2 shows an example system involving the interface between a port controller and a Lattice Semiconduc-
tor FPGA.
Figure 17-2. Interface Timing Example
In the system above, several parameters have already been provided:
• System clock frequency: period (P): 30 ns.
• Port controller maximum output propagation delay (PDMAXp): 18ns.
• Port controller minimum output propagation delay (PDMINp): 3 ns.
• Port controller input setup specification (TSp): 5 ns.
• Port controller input hold specification (THp): 3 ns.
• Max board propagation delay (PDMAXb): 6 ns.
• Min board propagation delay (PDMINb): 1 ns.
• Port controller to FPGA device clock skew and vice versa (Tskew): 1 ns.
clk
Quality of Preference File = Quality of PAR Results
Chip to chip clock skew of 1 ns
Controller
3 ns to 18 ns clk to out,
5 ns setup, 3 ns hold
9 pf input capacitance,
60 pf AC load
Port
Board propagation
delay of 1 ns to 2 ns
PCB traces
17-4
5 pf parasitic board capacitance
Lattice
9 pf input capacitance
FPGA
Lattice Semiconductor FPGA
Successful Place and Route