PNX1302EH NXP Semiconductors, PNX1302EH Datasheet - Page 282

PNX1302EH

Manufacturer Part Number
PNX1302EH
Description
Manufacturer
NXP Semiconductors
Datasheet

Specifications of PNX1302EH

Lead Free Status / RoHS Status
Not Compliant

Available stocks

Company
Part Number
Manufacturer
Quantity
Price
Part Number:
PNX1302EH
Manufacturer:
NXP
Quantity:
201
Part Number:
PNX1302EH
Manufacturer:
XILINX
0
Part Number:
PNX1302EH
Manufacturer:
PHILIPS/飞利浦
Quantity:
20 000
Part Number:
PNX1302EH,557
Manufacturer:
NXP Semiconductors
Quantity:
10 000
Part Number:
PNX1302EH/G
Manufacturer:
NXP
Quantity:
5 510
Part Number:
PNX1302EH/G
Manufacturer:
NXP/恩智浦
Quantity:
20 000
PNX1300/01/02/11 Data Book
When VO is running in image mode 4:2:2 or 4:2:0 without
upscaling and overlay enabled, the requirements be-
come:
• During the first 64 VO clock cycles at least one
• During 128 VO clock cycles, VO block requires that
If the settings are 33% for the CPU, 33% for VO and 33%
for L3 blocks then the worst case arbitration pattern is
CPU L3 VO, CPU L3 VO, etc.
The first requirement limits the VO/SDRAM ratio to
(64 / [19 + 10 + 20 + 3 * 20]) = 58.7%.
The second requirement gives a VO/SDRAM ratio of
44.29% (128 / [19 + 10 + 20 + 3 * 20 + 3 * 20 * 3]).
Thus if VO clock speed is supposed to be 54 MHz (pro-
gressive scan) the SDRAM must run at least at 122 MHz.
By setting the arbiter to 25% for the CPU, 37.5% for VO
and 37.5% for VI (CPU
1, L3
the arbitration pattern becomes CPU VI VO VI CPU VO
VI VO CPU VI VO.
Now both VI and VO are able to catch one request out of
two, thanks to the read / write overlap. This leads to a
VO/SDRAM ratio of 47.5% or a 113 MHz SDRAM.
20.6.3
If VO is running at 27 MHz (NTSC or PAL) without over-
lay and CPU
are set to ‘1’, then the worst case latency derived from
20.5.1
L
+ 19 = 169 SDRAM cycles (assumes R
The latency for VO is 1 request in 64 VO clock cycles. If
SDRAM is running at 80 MHz, then the maximum latency
tolerated by VO is floor(64 / (27 / 80)) = 189 SDRAM cy-
cles.
20-8
VO,sc
request must be acked (the OL (overlay) data).
4 requests be acked ([4 OLs, two Ys one V and one
U]/2).
weight
for VO is:
= (ceil[(1 + 1) / 1] + ceil[(3 + 1) / 1] + 1) * 20 + 10
Raising Priority
= 1, assuming only VO and VI are enabled)
weight
is set to ‘3’ while all the other weights
PRELIMINARY SPECIFICATION
weight
= 1, L2
weight
VO
= 3, VO
= ‘0’).
weight
=
This means that VO requests can remain at low priority
for 189 - 169 = 20 SDRAM cycles.
If the CPU clock speed is 100 MHz (ratio is 5 / 4) then the
ARB_RAISE register can be programmed to:
floor(20 * (5 / 4) / 16) = 1.
VO requests will stay at low priority for 16 cycles allowing
slightly better average CPU performance.
20.6.4
There is no obvious way to set the best weights for laten-
cy or bandwidth allocation since the behavior of each
block cannot be easily described with equations. Practi-
cal results obtained by running applications showed that
once the arbiter is weighted to meet latencies the re-
maining weight settings do not allow much improvement.
The best way to tune the weights is by experiment, run-
ning the application.
The only accurate computation is the maximum worst
case latency, which ensures that the hard real-time units
work properly. This computation gives an upper bound
and can be too pessimistic - but it still gives the right or-
der of magnitude. Refer to
mended allocation method.
Table 20-5. Recommended Allocation Method
Video In
Video Out
Audio In
Audio Out
SPDIF Out
ICP
PCI
VLD
DVDD
Conclusion
allocate required latency
allocate required latency
allocate required latency
allocate required latency
allocate required latency
allocate bandwidth
allocate bandwidth
allocate bandwidth/latency
allocate bandwidth/latency
Philips Semiconductors
Table 20-5
for the recom-

Related parts for PNX1302EH