LFXP10C-3F388I Lattice, LFXP10C-3F388I Datasheet - Page 348

no-image

LFXP10C-3F388I

Manufacturer Part Number
LFXP10C-3F388I
Description
FPGA LatticeXP Family 10000 Cells 320MHz 130nm (CMOS) Technology 1.8V/2.5V/3.3V 388-Pin FBGA Tray
Manufacturer
Lattice
Datasheets

Specifications of LFXP10C-3F388I

Package
388FBGA
Family Name
LatticeXP
Device Logic Units
10000
Maximum Internal Frequency
320 MHz
Typical Operating Supply Voltage
1.8|2.5|3.3 V
Maximum Number Of User I/os
244
Ram Bits
221184
Re-programmability Support
Yes
Lead Free Status / Rohs Status
Contains lead / RoHS non-compliant

Available stocks

Company
Part Number
Manufacturer
Quantity
Price
Part Number:
LFXP10C-3F388I
Manufacturer:
LATTICE
Quantity:
176
Part Number:
LFXP10C-3F388I
Manufacturer:
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
Quantity:
10 000
Lattice Semiconductor
This particular example shows a 99.0% coverage. The way to find unconstrained paths is to run Trace with the
“Check Unconstrained Paths” checkbox selected. This will give a list of all of the signals that are not covered under
timing analysis. In some designs, many of these signals are a common ground net that indeed does not need to be
constrained. Designers should understand this point and use Trace (the ispLEVER static timing analysis tool) to
check unconstrained paths to make sure they are not missing any design paths that are timing critical.
Also, note the timing score shown in Figure 17-1. The timing score shows the total amount of error (in picoseconds)
for all timing preferences constraining the design. PAR attempts to minimize the timing score, PAR does not
attempt to maximize frequency.
The above discussion can be summarized by the following single equality:
Translating Board Requirements into FPGA Preferences
Understanding the system board level timing and design constraints is the primary requirement for producing a
complete preference file. As a result, the major requirements such as clock frequency, I/O timing and loads can be
translated into the appropriate preference statements in a constraint file.
The following exercise will provide an example on how to extract preferences from system conditions.
Figure 17-2 shows an example system involving the interface between a port controller and a Lattice Semiconduc-
tor FPGA.
Figure 17-2. Interface Timing Example
In the system above, several parameters have already been provided:
• System clock frequency: period (P): 30 ns.
• Port controller maximum output propagation delay (PDMAXp): 18ns.
• Port controller minimum output propagation delay (PDMINp): 3 ns.
• Port controller input setup specification (TSp): 5 ns.
• Port controller input hold specification (THp): 3 ns.
• Max board propagation delay (PDMAXb): 6 ns.
• Min board propagation delay (PDMINb): 1 ns.
• Port controller to FPGA device clock skew and vice versa (Tskew): 1 ns.
clk
Quality of Preference File = Quality of PAR Results
Chip to chip clock skew of 1 ns
Controller
3 ns to 18 ns clk to out,
5 ns setup, 3 ns hold
9 pf input capacitance,
60 pf AC load
Port
Board propagation
delay of 1 ns to 2 ns
PCB traces
17-4
5 pf parasitic board capacitance
Lattice
9 pf input capacitance
FPGA
Lattice Semiconductor FPGA
Successful Place and Route

Related parts for LFXP10C-3F388I